Donald Trump recently introduced an international proposal he calls the “Board of Peace,” describing it as a way to speed up the resolution of major global conflicts, including the crisis in the Gaza Strip. The plan is presented as a new diplomatic structure focused on rapid decision-making.

Early details suggest countries seeking permanent membership would contribute about one billion dollars. Several nations — including Germany, Canada, France, Italy, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and Ukraine — reportedly declined participation.

Other governments signaled support, among them Israel, Argentina, Russia, Hungary, and Saudi Arabia. The initiative has therefore generated immediate international debate about its structure and influence.

A symbolic invitation was extended to the head of the Roman Catholic Church, Pope Leo XIV. This week, the Vatican confirmed he will not take part in the initiative.

Vatican officials said the proposal was reviewed carefully before a final decision was made. The review concluded that the Pope prefers peace efforts rooted in existing diplomatic systems rather than a newly created body led by a single nation.

Pietro Parolin explained that conflicts involving humanitarian suffering and regional instability are better addressed through established international institutions, particularly the United Nations.

The decision reflects the Vatican’s long-standing emphasis on multilateral diplomacy, shared responsibility, and protection of civilians. Officials argue that collective accountability can help limit unilateral political power in times of war.

Reactions to the “Board of Peace” remain divided. Supporters say new structures could move faster than traditional diplomacy, while critics question funding, authority, and oversight — highlighting an ongoing debate between efficiency and cooperative international process.